Neglectful Parents! Beyonce' Kim Kardashian

She does. A lot of people get upset when you say beyonce needs to do her babies hair but I don't get it. If you can look presentable why can't your child. Hell if she's so rich why doesn't she hire someone to do it, it's jus really sad. I started to make a post about it on lsa but then I was like you know what I don't have time to be dealing with these crazy ass stans. I'm just glad my mother always made sure I was presentable.

I agree with the video for the most part, but it seems everyone is forgetting or having selective memory about how Beyonce partied, hung out late, and traveled excessively when she was allegedly pregnant. Then right after she allegedly "birthed" Blue, she went right back to doing the things she was doing before. There are many many pictures of Beyonce partying it up with Jay when most people thought she should've been at home with her newborn. So, in my eyes Beyonce is no better than Kim, in that reguard. I think people became forgiving when Bey announced she would be taking Blue with her on tour, which I thought was very selfish of her to have her and then have the nerve to go on tour so soon. At that time Blue was nothing but an infant. I'm not taking up for Kim at all. But if we're going to judge then let's be fair. We've seen Kim out with her baby a few times and she had her covered. Just as when Beyonce first had Blue, she took pics of her taking a covered up Blue (which some thought was a fake prop) for several (staged) walks and the next, she is out somewhere in the world partying it up with Jay. Since Blue is older, it looks as though Kim is basically following Beyonce's pattern of parenting. So I expect to see North being put in the same situations as Blue is in. I'm hoping Kanye don't feel the need to do the same and drag his family with him while North is so young.

I do sense something is going on and that what we see is done on purpose.  Maybe Blue is in the early stages of being programmed because most of the time when we see this baby she is looking androgynous.  If we weren't told Blue is a girl, most of us wouldn't be too sure what she is.  On the surface, no one would've thought neither Jay or Bey would do something like this with Jay's image as macho and Bey's as feminine, but when we see how robotic they are and realize they too are programmed, all of this makes sense and we can identify this with being apart of an agenda set in place by the Elites.  Long story short, It's done to undo families and reduce population.  (A quick research on this subject can better explain this agenda.)  Yet, this isn't something that's not unheard of in the industry.  When I think of kids being programmed, I think of Will and Jada Smith's children, Willow and Jaden.  They look like they've been turned loose in the industry and are being raised by the industry.  They are surrounded by strange industry folk all the time and are seen all over the place doing things adults would do, like hanging in bars, hanging with adults, etc...  And if you've seen any recent pictures of them, their eyes look empty already and just like Blue, they also look androgynous a lot of times too. 
Another thing I've heard about that the Smith's may share in common with the Carter's, is that they too are also bi-sexual.  Could this be another reason why gender identity is blurred when it comes to how their kids are presented to the world?  If a person chooses this life for themselves is one thing, but when a child is born and the parents decided to blur their identity, well that is another thing.  The legendary singer Cher raised her daughter, Chasity, as a girly girl all of her life until Chasity grew up and decided on her own to change her gender to male. 

Blue is always lookin' like a boy. i'm tellin' you guys, that's boy!

You bring up some very interesting points. They are clearly conforming to what is expected of them by the elite. I mean Beyonce is the daughter of Celestine Knowles who had her child's hair laid to the heavens before she even said her first word. As image concious as Beyonce is, it just doen't make any sense for her to keep her kids hair looking like that.

I can't help but laugh when people think Jay and Beyonce actually run things in any aspect of their lives. They are slaves. full stop. they will do whhatever they are told. It's not even about music or creating art. It's about a handful of people ruling over the entire world. And these two are just mere pawns.


Another thought: maybe Beyonce thinks Blue is ugly and therefore why bother with her hair.

Something this lady in the video said stuck with me. When she said "when you name your kid Apple". I never really gave it much thought till now. It got me thinking why would someone pick an unnatural name for their child. And I don't mean names from foregin languages but names that are not names for human beings eg; Apple, Blue, North, Peaches, Axl, and all those other ones.

Here's what I thought and concluded:

A name is a powerful thing. Even biblically, God changed several peoples names to reflect their destiny Abram-Abraham, Sarai-Sarah, Saul-Paul and on and on. When a parent names a child we assume they choose something meaningful to them whilst also considering the child's life with that name.
I feel that when a celebrity or anyone gives their child a ridiculous name, it dehumanizes the child. Blue is not a person, it is an accessory belonging to Beyonce and Jay, an extension of their image like Roca Wear and House of Dereon. An accessory does not need a human name. It has no feelings. It exists as a very small part of something much bigger and far more important than itself. An accessory does not exist and has no value outside of the Main Thing.
My dogs are an extension of me and my personality. I have dogs that suit me and my needs/lifestyle. I own my dogs. Outside of me, they would not exist as they are. As long as I am alive, they will never have an identity separate from me. I am the center of their world. I can name them anything I want. I can choose silly names, cute names, anything I want and no one can say anything and the dogs can't complain because they are just dogs. I bought them. They have a place and function in my life that centers around me.
That's why people can name their pets/companies/beloved cars any ridiculous thing they want, because they are not human.

You can't say the same thing about a baby. Blue, Apple, all those kids are human beings; who have feelings, hope and fears. Who even while they are still minors are a separate entity and can exist alone as such. Blue will not cease to exist if Beyonce dies. Beyonce should not be the center of Blue's universe. Blue is a unique human life. And Beyonce should have revered that fact and respected her child enough to give her a dignified name. Along with all those other deseprate women.
Regardless of whether you are rich or whatever, those names are ridiculous. Even Beyonce mumbled something trivial and psuedo-deep when asked to explain naming her child. So did Gwyneth Paltrow, as did Kim Kardashian. You can say any superficially sweet explanation to why you have given your child a ridiculous name but at the end of the day we all know why you did it.
Because you are a self-obsessed narcisistic piece of crap that decided to use an innocent child to further your own vacuous reason for existing.

If you think about it, most of the children who have normal names are kept away from the lime light. Have lives that are as normal and healthy for children as can be given the circumstances.
Then there's the other kids. There's a difference between paprazzi shots and your parents themselves broadcasting your image all over the web. It's always the kids with messed up names who's parent are most eager to put them out there. Blue, Apple, North.
They use these kids in a way that I am sure will result in deep psychological damage in the future.