|
Post by nicki on Mar 13, 2015 15:56:54 GMT
Why can't these people properly fake a pregnancy? The duchess is supposed to be 8 months along but she looks like she's about 5. Here she is standing up. Okay she may be carrying small so I could kind of believe she's pregnant here but what 8 month pregnant woman do you know can stoop like this in heels. Where did the belly go? If you're going to fake a pregnancy, do some research beforehand to understand how real pregnant women move and find out what their physical limitations are. I know I'm ranting but this type of foolishness bothers me because it insults my intelligence . OT: Am I the only person who suspects she's older than 33?
|
|
|
Post by purplekisses on Mar 13, 2015 17:25:36 GMT
Why can't these people properly fake a pregnancy? The duchess is supposed to be 8 months along but she looks like she's about 5. Here she is standing up. Okay she may be carrying small so I could kind of believe she's pregnant here but what 8 month pregnant woman do you know can stoop like this in heels. Where did the belly go? If you're going to fake a pregnancy, do some research beforehand to understand how real pregnant women move and find out what their physical limitations are. I know I'm ranting but this type of foolishness bothers me because it insults my intelligence . OT: Am I the only person who suspects she's older than 33?nope I think she 38
|
|
|
Post by eljjai on Mar 13, 2015 21:04:55 GMT
Preach! I laughed my ass off at her first "pregnancy" and she's gotten no better since then. I wish her pillow could just flop off on some red carpet. They would never recover from it. It would ruin the monarchy. Can't stand these useless leaching fakes. and so many british people are so subdued by ths whole monarchy crap they think it's right to let these people rob the blind in broad daylight. putting out BS statistics like, the queen makes the country so much money in tourist pounds. I'm like, is she personally serving every tourist tea and crumpets? Please, they could ship the whole lot of them out and the palaces would still stand and attract people. Just their security bill alone could feed a small country.
|
|
|
Post by eljjai on Mar 13, 2015 21:08:17 GMT
and yes, she is much much older than 33. she's also terribly vapid.
|
|
|
Post by Guest** on Mar 13, 2015 21:27:52 GMT
I don't follow the royals but for a country to think they need a ruling, unelected, inbred monarchy ..... puts them on pare with the beydazzel stans. I just smh with all the British stupidity.
|
|
|
Post by shanaelmsford on Mar 15, 2015 3:19:13 GMT
I go out of my way not to give Methusela, Baldy, Lizardbeth, Raggedy Andy, et al.* any of my attention , and for a long time I didn't know that there was any reason to suspect that the first pregnancy was fake. One day I was looking at some news website and I saw pictures of Methusela playing volleyball at some party about 2 months after "giving birth". She was wearing those tired black wedges and her shirt had come up when she spiked the ball, so her bare stomach was plainly visible. Some women don't gain much weight when they're pregnant, some women lose weight faster than others, and some women don't get obvious stretch marks or a lot of loose skin but her stomach was as flat as her chest and there was no trace of a full-term pregnancy. Also, I'm pretty sure that the pelvic ligaments in a pregnant woman's body soften up to prepare for birth. I don't know how long it takes for the body to return to normal but there aren't too many women who'd be trying to jump around in heels so soon after having a baby. I poked around on the D.I. forum since it's UK-based and they have a whole thread about her first "pregnancy". Her bump collapsed like 3 times and she only "gained weight" in her boobs and stomach but of course none of the media outlets said anything about the obvious fakery - they lied about that just like they lie about her age (if that wrinkled crone is only 33 then I'm 20), her voluminous "hair" (it's mostly weave), and about her being just a commoner (she and Baldy are cousins via some royal ancestors; I don't think she would have been eligible for marriage otherwise). *The only exception is Carrot Top when I had a crush on him... and when those naked pics came out. Don't judge me too harshly, lol
|
|
|
Post by backup26 on Mar 15, 2015 6:58:17 GMT
I've heard about this. Apparently she's worse than Bey when it comes to this, but considering she's a royal, many don't/won't question her for it. I've read she can't have kids naturally.
|
|
|
Post by nicki on Mar 15, 2015 13:53:59 GMT
I go out of my way not to give Methusela, Baldy, Lizardbeth, Raggedy Andy, et al.* any of my attention , and for a long time I didn't know that there was any reason to suspect that the first pregnancy was fake. One day I was looking at some news website and I saw pictures of Methusela playing volleyball at some party about 2 months after "giving birth". She was wearing those tired black wedges and her shirt had come up when she spiked the ball, so her bare stomach was plainly visible. Some women don't gain much weight when they're pregnant, some women lose weight faster than others, and some women don't get obvious stretch marks or a lot of loose skin but her stomach was as flat as her chest and there was no trace of a full-term pregnancy. Also, I'm pretty sure that the pelvic ligaments in a pregnant woman's body soften up to prepare for birth. I don't know how long it takes for the body to return to normal but there aren't too many women who'd be trying to jump around in heels so soon after having a baby. I poked around on the D.I. forum since it's UK-based and they have a whole thread about her first "pregnancy". Her bump collapsed like 3 times and she only "gained weight" in her boobs and stomach but of course none of the media outlets said anything about the obvious fakery - they lied about that just like they lie about her age (if that wrinkled crone is only 33 then I'm 20), her voluminous "hair" (it's mostly weave), and about her being just a commoner (she and Baldy are cousins via some royal ancestors; I don't think she would have been eligible for marriage otherwise). *The only exception is Carrot Top when I had a crush on him... and when those naked pics came out. Don't judge me too harshly, lol I can't judge you because I love me some carrot top too and I don't normally like red heads at all. I figured Duchy didn't show much with the first pregnancy because she was naturally thin but then I found some forum were there were photos of her posing nude while in college and realized ole duchess is really a chubby little thing. Celebrities who lie and don't take the time to back up their lies irk me. eljjai I was done with the royals after the REAL princess was taken out. They all look like a miserable bunch of useless bums, with the exception being Harry (ooh). They do nothing but take from their people, it's horrible. purplekisses 38 seems about right.
|
|
|
Post by shanaelmsford on Mar 24, 2015 13:55:58 GMT
I was in the self-checkout yesterday when I saw some crap about Methusela's emergency "delivery" on the cover of US Magazine. It's no coincidence that the "birth" happened near the spring equinox. Since its twins don't be surprised if there's a strong theme of duality with these kids - one very extroverted, one very introverted, one upheld as very well behaved, the other is rebellious, etc. They'll be as different as day and night
|
|
|
Post by eljjai on Apr 13, 2015 19:30:23 GMT
Look at the way she is hunched over on that slide Looking at the size of that belly when she's standing up, how is she hunched over like that, how is there so much space in her jacket all of a sudden?
|
|
|
Post by shanaelmsford on Apr 13, 2015 21:56:52 GMT
^ When she's sitting upright it looks like she's hiding snacks to sneak into a movie theater, not pregnant. (I know that look because I always bring outside foods to the movies ) When she's bent forward it looks like she's wearing a bulky sweater under her coat. Don't those people have some in-house advisors or PR people who could have given her tips on how to look believably pregnant? If you're going to hoax people you shouldn't be lazy about it.
|
|
|
Post by nicki on Apr 15, 2015 11:52:59 GMT
She's due on April 25th so that would make her approximately 36 weeks pregnant in these photos. Really? . SMH!
|
|
|
Post by shanaelmsford on Apr 15, 2015 17:08:21 GMT
^ If she didn't "give birth" yet then what was that magazine cover about last month? I'm not crazy; I know I didn't just imagine her smug, lipless face on that gossip rag or the caption underneath it. Did they just run the story early by mistake? Maybe it was one of the lesser rags (Enquier) instead if US Magazine like I remember.
|
|
|
Post by nicki on Apr 15, 2015 22:45:52 GMT
The Enquirer sometimes gives up some good tea. I wouldn't be surprised if her surrogate probably had the baby last month so when we see Kate standing outside of the hospital holding her supposed newborn it will probably be a baby that was delivered 7 or 8 weeks ago.
|
|
|
Post by shanaelmsford on May 3, 2015 20:48:35 GMT
^ Some people suspect that Curious George is actually a little older than his reported age so I wouldn't be surprised if it's the case for this baby. And even though Methuselah only "delivered" one baby I think there may be a little truth to that twin tea I read about and alluded to earlier. I used to think that idea of body doubles or secret twins is nutty but considering how blatantly shady these people are very little would surprise me. One baby may have been taken home but that doesn't mean the surrogate was only pregnant with one child this time.
Did anyone else think that nurse committing "suicide" was really a blood sacrifice? That whole story just seemed really off to me and I never bought it completely It makes me wonder who/what was may have been the sacrifice this time. I think that this "birth" is a convenient distraction from more important news but I can't think of anything that's as obviously fishy as that situation with the nurse.
|
|
|
Post by nicki on May 4, 2015 19:12:26 GMT
I don't know much about the story but from what I read that nurse suicide seemed really suspicious and shady to me. When it comes to the new baby I'm shocked to see that most of the comments on one of my favorite blogs (dlisted)are from people who actually believe she gave birth both times. I thought those people were smarter than that.
|
|
|
Post by shanaelmsford on May 4, 2015 20:19:44 GMT
nicki I think it's because most people don't really question inconsistencies in the behavior of people whom they like or feel neutral towards. Methuselah's obvious fakery isn't going to get the same blow-back as Bouncy's did because B is over exposed and desperately tries to craft an uber-perfect image. There's a lot of fake "perfect" stuff about Meth too but she doesn't have desperate PR reps leaking stories about her every week or stans terrorizing people online who don't like her. Plus Meth has more power working in her favor. If too many commoners on mainstream sites point out the obvious the Palace's PR cleaners just snap their fingers and have websites delete the "offensive" comments (which is something that's been known to happen on UK and Aus news outlets) or post on popular message boards to try to discredit any legit gossip.
|
|
|
Post by nicki on May 5, 2015 3:01:26 GMT
^That would explain it and it also explains their dislike for Angelina Jolie. I'm just so happy there are people here who can see through all the bs that goes on in the news.
|
|
|
Post by eljjai on May 5, 2015 6:41:13 GMT
^ Some people suspect that Curious George is actually a little older than his reported age so I wouldn't be surprised if it's the case for this baby. And even though Methuselah only "delivered" one baby I think there may be a little truth to that twin tea I read about and alluded to earlier. I used to think that idea of body doubles or secret twins is nutty but considering how blatantly shady these people are very little would surprise me. One baby may have been taken home but that doesn't mean the surrogate was only pregnant with one child this time. Did anyone else think that nurse committing "suicide" was really a blood sacrifice? That whole story just seemed really off to me and I never bought it completely It makes me wonder who/what was may have been the sacrifice this time. I think that this "birth" is a convenient distraction from more important news but I can't think of anything that's as obviously fishy as that situation with the nurse. That nurse died because she somehow found out the truth about the surrogacy. The whole radio people pranking her all the way from australia story was just too ridiculous for words. Security would have been tight in every way. Even via phones. She was murdered because she knew too much
|
|
|
Post by eljjai on May 5, 2015 6:42:15 GMT
I don't know much about the story but from what I read that nurse suicide seemed really suspicious and shady to me. When it comes to the new baby I'm shocked to see that most of the comments on one of my favorite blogs (dlisted)are from people who actually believe she gave birth both times. I thought those people were smarter than that. IKR I expected so much more from Dlisted.
|
|